So the Boy Scouts of America voted to allow openly gay
scouts to be scouts but not troop leaders.
Baby steps have not been uncommon for the scouts when it comes to social
change. It wasn’t until 1974 that the
scouts became fully integrated. Jewish,
Asian and African Americans were often forced into their own troops. In fact at one point when African American
scouts were forming troops there was a move to ban them from wearing the
uniform. Separate but unequal or just
plain discriminatory was common in the scouts.
My mother didn’t let me join because the recruiter at my school told me
I had to have a haircut. That didn’t sit
well with my mom born in 1935 Germany. But the scouts should be praised for taking
what I am sure is a chance on this change.
Let’s be clear, there have always been gay scouts, and gay scout
leaders. There always will be. When a young boy joins the scouts in 1st
grade he may not know his sexual orientation.
Most kids don’t. Moving up
through the years he may not encounter attraction until well within the high
school years and by then with most scouts I have known it is just part of who
they are, and a big part. I have helped
scouts attain Religious Badges for Judaism and have been to several Eagle Scout
ceremonies over the years. The scouts I
encountered in that time have scouting in their blood. Being gay hardly enters into the mix for
them. Just like being gay doesn’t have a
huge impact on being a football player or swimmer.
What I find amazing is the backlash that can only be
described as bigotry. People are melting
down their scout medals and burning patches in protest. They are disassociating themselves from
scouting and spreading lies about sexual abuses that have been a problem for
scouting being the result of gay scouts and leaders. The sheer hate being spewed blinds them from
the very essence of what a scout is suppose to be. But leaving that all behind, they call this
the end of scouting, while participating in its demise by not continuing their
support. Basically what has happened is
that Boy Scouts of America will allow troops to enroll gay members and not kick
out scouts who identify as gay, while maintaining that individual troops can
still discriminate. It is a move that
inches toward full inclusion but actually just ends what was a defacto Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.
But probably the most ridiculous of the comments I see on
this is that somehow allowing gay scouts is sexualizing scouts. This is not a new argument. The very act of acknowledging gay people is
seen by some as sexualizing the situation.
Recently I went to buy perfume with Dianne. This has been a chore because we don’t seem
to like the same things and my favorite perfume never really seemed right on
her. So we sprayed a few on various
spots to test, I would lean in to smell or take the wrist to my nose. When we settled on one she hugged me tight
and gave me a big kiss. Right there in
front of God and everybody. The woman
selling to us smiled and made a comment about love. I described a similar scenario only with two
married men I know to someone who then asked me why they have to show their
sexuality in public. When straight
people hug, kiss and hold hands in public it is a sign of love. When gay people do it there are many who see
it as sex. That is not only a double
standard it is frightening as to what those people think love is.
Love, sexual attraction and sexual acts are not the same
thing and can be mutually exclusive.
From a purely biological perspective, love is the result of interpreting
the arousal you feel due to sexual and emotional attraction to a particular
person or persons. It is somewhat hard
wired. We see someone who we think is attractive;
it causes a series of autonomic responses in our body due to chemical releases
in the brain and endocrine system. We
approach that person and if they return any interest, those physical feelings
continue and get interpreted in that context.
A deep attraction finds one thinking about getting that feeling back and
contact with the object of that feeling brings it on. As this continues and the two people involved
share more about themselves, both physically and in their minds (likes, dreams,
desires for future) those feelings move to be what we call love. While some see this as a blending of souls it
has been studied and while we can’t explain all the whys and wherefores we know
that the initial response is not under the control of the person. Attraction is not something you can
decide. That goes for gay people and
straight people.
Physical sex is a different thing entirely. Sex is more the product of physical desire
for release and the stimulation that gets you there. Without getting too graphic, what stimulates
and how is not about attraction, desire or orientation. Many times people have had a sexual encounter
with someone they have not found attractive.
In fact people will have same sex encounters given the right set of
circumstances. Prisons are often
mentioned in this context. Prison
same-sex encounters are highly complicated because while some are simply for
release others are about power and control over another prisoner. Those that aren’t usually involve straight
people who want a partner and there are few female opportunities. In fact in some of these encounters in men’s
prisons the more dominate prisoner will find was to feed the fantasy that the
other prisoner is a woman with makeup, lipstick and hair dos. But a
clearer example is the large number of gay individuals who grew up hearing how
horrible being gay is trying to build a straight life. This often includes marriage and children,
only to run out of patience and announce the truth or worse carry on affairs
that can be dangerous for many reasons.
Defining a person by who they are sexual attracted to is not
only unfair it is ignorant and bigoted.
Gay people are no more likely in most settings to be overly sexual. While it is true that in certain contexts gay
men tend to flaunt sexuality. But this
is more a protest to a culture that never saw them as appropriate for public
viewing at all. I would argue that when
gay couples are more normative, men in chaps and tight shorts will be LESS
likely to be walking down 5th Avenue in a parade and the Castro
district will be just another funky neighbor.
Anti-gay culture drove gay men underground and when they came out, some
wanted to be in your face about it.
Many, many, many more just want to be able to be listed with their
partners in company directories and obituaries of their parents without losing
their jobs, positions in their community organizations or getting kicked out of
scouting. What the people who are so
dead set against gays being treated as full humans tend not to understand that
their double standards are slowly being lost to history. But in the mean time the pace is still not
fast enough.
I am both amused and frightened by the growing anger of
people who are anti-gay. I hope for
dialogue. But until that is possible I
applaud the Boy Scouts of America for their thoughtful approach and while half
a loaf, it is on par with how they have historically expressed change. Now if the Supreme Court does the right thing
in the coming weeks we might all move into an era where gay people are seen as
people. Where the old couple holding
hands is cute regardless of whether they are two men, two women or a man and
woman, and that the marriage of two people of the same sex is celebrated in
every college newspaper as much as a straight couple. I can hope.
Join me, it is more fun than holding onto anger.