In the early days of the internet
the two fastest growing segments were the porn industry and the hate groups. While
porn was often purely a mercantile venture, hate was an attempt at giving voice
to what had become impolite in our evolving society. The anonymity of the medium allowed people to
say whatever they had in mind and put it out there. Finding
like minded people became easy and entire virtual communities developed based
on hate. Message boards gave way to chat
rooms then social media exploded with new ways for people to connect in real
time with strangers. While hate groups are
near their saturation point their brand of nasty language and attack voices
have become main stream for some. For
example on Twitter where small minded people, ginned up by members of the right
wing noise machine elite, attack anyone who
dares challenge their warped view of the world.
Sandra Fluke has become a
favorite. The woman who was originally
banned from testifying to Congress on contraceptive drugs in health care plans
in favor of an all male witness list has been the target of a nasty and orchestrated
attack pattern by the minions of Rush Limbaugh.
Fluke was called a slut by Limbaugh on his radio show in an attempt to
remain relevant. The outcry, the loss of
sponsors and the subsequent showing that America has for the most part left
Limbaugh at the last rest stop has called out a backlash that is just short of
pathetic. Ignorance, when married to
anonymity and hate leads to people calling her a prostitute and other unsavory
things. In fact they actively seek her
out to do this. A form of
cyber-stalking. The ignorance is fed by
the noise machine that lies so blatantly about virtually everything that some
fact-checkers have given up, concluding there is no point to fact check
fiction. But while there is no doubt
that the right wing noise machine has started to sputter and shake, it still
has a following and so as it gets nastier and more hate driven we will see more
attacks. Some beyond anything one would
imagine in appropriate discourse.
Sandra Fluke put herself out there
and is a strong adult. She need not
worry about most of the things said about her.
While she has had death threats, most is just some person who has not
lived up to their dreams of their own self-worth and striking out. They appear to be jealous failures who hate
the fact that a smart, active and attractive woman could do so much damage to
their hero. It is sad really. But this week we were visited by a series of
hateful and downright disgusting tweets that even surprised me.
Gabby Giffords testified in front of
Congress on gun legislation. Giffords
was the Arizona Congresswoman who was shot in the head in an assassination attempt. A moderate Democrat and strongly pro-gun her
story riveted the country for a few weeks as we saw her recover and watched the
suffering of those families who lost loved ones, including a nine year
old. Giffords recovered since the 2011
shooting but resigned her seat in Congress.
Earlier this week she spoke to Congress.
Having not recovered from her injuries completely she read a statement,
slowly and with difficulty announcing her interest in controlling access to
certain types of weapons and accessories that are designed to simply kill
people.
Almost immediately the Twitter world
exploded with statements like: Retarded Democrat Gabrielle Giffords
Exploiting her Shooting Tragedy to Force Americans to Accept Tougher Gun Control
Laws! Michelle Malkin, a woman who
seems to think she is doing journalism, attacked Giffords and the press because
there was a report that the hand written notes used by Giffords to testify were
written by her when in fact they were written by her speech therapist. Giffords brain does not function as well as
it did before a man with a legally purchased weapon put a bullet through it,
but that didn’t stop Malkin and her minions from saying such hateful things
about her. Malkin seemed to think it was
a ploy for sympathy to post the notes. I
don’t know, I think there was plenty of sympathy for Giffords who spoke with
conviction while reminded the panel that she and her husband are legal gun
owners and have been long adocates of gun-rights. But Malkin and others felt it was fine to
attack a woman who was shot in an assassination attempt for the reason she disagrees
with their view of the universe and does so by attacking her disability that
was the result of her being shot.
This is not okay, spin on policy,
questioning of certain people’s motives and even negative rhetoric in a campaign all have
a long history in our country’s political landscape. But attacking a person who fought against all
odds to find a solution to a growing problem and bring it to her former
colleagues only to be attack as a “retard” or “dumb bitch” by small people is
not okay. The NRA and other gun
advocates should denounce these pathetic and disgusting statements publically
or I will just have to assume that they are part of what they believe. In that case we should all pity them for
their serious lack of compassion and manners and they have no place in our
society. Also I wonder if it isn’t a
mental disorder driving this and well, should you really own a gun?
No comments:
Post a Comment